miss_s_b: (Politics: Goth Lib Dems)
[personal profile] miss_s_b
Today's Beyond Belief is talking about poly relationships, and the interview with the poly guy was quite interesting. He didn't make enough of communication for my liking, but he did ok. Unfortunately, they are having a post match discussion and the monogamous Christian guy is making me want to scream and throw things at the radio with his level of Not Getting It. He is going on about how broken promises hurt people and things, and ignoring the fact that in a poly relationship you don't make promises of monogamy by definition. The wanker. There's a very reasonable woman called Lisa who is cheering me up, though.

Anyway, this brings me to a poll:

Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: Just the Poll Creator, participants: 32

Is it possible for a person to love more than one person deeply enough to want to spend the rest of their life with them (whether or not you personally could do it)?

Yes
28 (87.5%)

No
0 (0.0%)

Maybe/Don't Know
4 (12.5%)

Marriage should be

Between one man and one woman, for life.
0 (0.0%)

Between any two (previously uncommitted or divorced) people who want to commit to each other, for life
3 (11.1%)

Between any number of people who want to commit to each other, for life
6 (22.2%)

Between one man and one woman, for as long as it lasts
0 (0.0%)

Between any two (previously uncommitted or divorced) people who want to commit to each other, for as long as it lasts
0 (0.0%)

Between any number of people who want to commit to each other, for as long as it lasts.
18 (66.7%)

The state should

Legislate on Marriage, because what happens in people's private relationships affects all of society
4 (13.3%)

Butt out of relationships between consenting adults; as long as there is no coercion, it's nobody's business but the participants.
26 (86.7%)

This poll is faulty!

It should have more ticky boxes
14 (56.0%)

You've worded the questions all wrong!
8 (32.0%)

I can't see how other people have voted and I want to be nosey!
8 (32.0%)

Something else which I will detail at great, mansplanatory length in the comments
3 (12.0%)





My February Sponsor is

To view this post with minimal formatting, click here. To view this post in your own Dreamwidth style, click here.

Date: Monday, February 15th, 2010 05:47 pm (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
Yes--there are group "marriages" and arrangements where permissions are needed and similar.

So some poly relationships can end up with broken promises. But that's different to an assertion that someone else=broken promise, which is what this idiot thought, Jennie hasn't broken any promises to me[1], but he wouldn't see it that way.

[1] apart from the whole "if you do the bins this morning I'll tidy the living room while you're out" thing, but, y'know, that doesn't count...

Date: Monday, February 15th, 2010 05:49 pm (UTC)
ginasketch: (Default)
From: [personal profile] ginasketch
Oh I wasn't saying that was the same thing as what gitface was claiming. I was just curious if that was defined as a poly relationship or just an open one.

[1] apart from the whole "if you do the bins this morning I'll tidy the living room while you're out" thing, but, y'know, that doesn't count...


Oh, no one keeps THOSE promises, silly boy.:P

ethics

Date: Monday, February 15th, 2010 06:11 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
There's a very interesting book called 'The Ethical Slut' which, although unspeakably American in places, is very clear on how polyamory is not simply having no ethics but in fact means a far more complicated set of relationships and the book tries to help guide people to do this ethically.

That means talking to each other, having agreed boundaries and rules, if one person is your 'primary' then remembering that all the other people still have feelings and aren't just your disposable playthings... etc, etc.

Incidentally I heard the programme too and wasn't that impressed with the poly guy but was impressed that the religious commentators didn't simply run out of the studio shouting 'Satan!!!!' Although they may have come close at one point.

Re: ethics

Date: Monday, February 15th, 2010 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Bother - didn't sign off. That was me.

Jim Jepps
The Daily (Maybe)
http://jimjay.blogspot.com

About This Blog

picture of Jennie Rigg

Hello! I'm Jennie (known to many as SB, due to my handle, or The Yorksher Gob because of my old blog's name). This blog is my public face; click here for a list of all the other places you can find me on t'interwebs.

twitstamp.com



Flattr this

Ebuzzing - Top Blogs Ebuzzing - Top Blogs - Politics



==================
Awards & Endorsements:

Click for a list of awards won by this blog
Quotes about me and a list of people who have sponsored this blog can be found here.


==================
Charities I support:

The Survivors' Trust - donate here
DogsTrust - donate here
CAB - donate here

==================


Creative Commons License
Miss SB by Jennie Rigg is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.
Based on a work at miss-s-b.dreamwidth.org.

Please note that any and all opinions expressed in this blog are subject to random change at whim my own, and not necessarily representative of my party, or any of the constituent parts thereof (except myself, obviously).

Printed by Dreamwidth Studios, Maryland USA. Promoted by Jennie Rigg, of Brighouse, West Yorkshire.

Style Credit

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Page generated Wednesday, June 19th, 2013 06:41 am

June 2013

M T W T F S S
      12
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 1415 16
17 181920212223
24252627282930

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags