miss_s_b: (feminist heroes: oracle)miss_s_b ([personal profile] miss_s_b) wrote,
@ 2010-04-22 05:26 pm UTC
Current mood: annoyed
Entry tags:ranking
So, Lib Dem Voice and others have been making a noise recently about the twitter 200, and how it ranks influential tweeters... So I checked my TweetLevel, and lo and behold, I should be #60 on the list, but I'm not even on it. Lots of male mainstream bloggers are, though. So what gives, Edelman? I fit your categories. I'm an established political blogger. I'm a candidate in elections. And my tweetlevel is higher than Lynne Featherstone's.

Perhaps this is a lesson for all of us in taking self-professed influence charts at face value.

(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

ext_51145: (National Pep)


[identity profile] andrewhickey.info
2010-04-22 04:33 pm UTC (link)
It's a totally ridiculous list. It's the Twitter equivalent of Wikio...

(Reply to this) 


tajasel: Photo of me pointing a camera outwards and grinning. (stealin ur soul)


[personal profile] tajasel
2010-04-22 08:16 pm UTC (link)
I’m a political blogger standing for local council and working for a PPC, with a TweetLevel of 45.6, and they missed me (@tajasel) out :(

(Reply to this)  (Thread) 


miss_s_b: (feminist heroes: oracle)


[personal profile] miss_s_b
2010-04-22 10:39 pm UTC (link)
I think that what we can glean from this is that they suck.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent) 


(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)