miss_s_b: (Who: Six (Drag Queen))miss_s_b ([personal profile] miss_s_b) wrote,
@ 2010-05-14 10:32 am UTC
Current mood: busy
Entry tags:feminism
Theresa May being in charge of equalities is being seen as an outrage akin to Ruth "Opus Dei" Kelly being in charge of communities. This is because Mrs May has a voting record on equalities which is... well, less than stellar would be putting it mildly. The thing is, Theresa May is Home Secretary, with Equalities bolted on as an afterthought, probably just because she's a woman. And yes, equalities being an afterthought is frustrating and offensive, but that's the way a government composed of and negotiated by white middle class men is ALWAYS going to see it.

Who is actually going to be doing the work on the equalities brief? I think you'll find it's Lynne Featherstone. Whose record is impeccable, whose work ethic is incredible, and whose views are much more acceptable than Mrs May's.

This, along with the fact that whatever her views Theresa May is actually comepetent and capable, and therefore will not be having the "girls suck at math" effect the way Jacqui Smith did, is the reason I am pretty relaxed about her appointment. No amount of flaming from anonytrolls is going to change that.


(9 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Threaded) (Top-level comments only)


[identity profile] sl4irl.livejournal.com
2010-05-14 09:53 am UTC (link)
As the "anonytroll" in question, I want to know how calling a homophobe a homophobe is "flaming".

p.s. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/apr/30/nick-clegg-lib-dem-labour

(Reply to this


miss_s_b: (feminist heroes: oracle)


[personal profile] miss_s_b
2010-05-14 09:57 am UTC (link)
You're not an anonytroll; you left a name. You didn't flame, you left a comment. Read the other comments on that entry and the previous one before you assume I am directing stuff at you.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent


I agree with Nick..


(Anonymous)
2010-05-14 09:57 am UTC (link)
and I agree with Jennie. What really irks Labour's bloggers and tweeters is that the combination of left and right in the ConLib government makes the Labour party's middle way schtick irrelevant. What else is there, 1983? You see their quandary.

(Reply to this



[identity profile] sl4irl.livejournal.com
2010-05-14 09:59 am UTC (link)
To clarify: a few of the anonymous comments belong to me. I'd assumed you'd have known that since you're IP tracking. This shift was because I've never used "OpenID" before & only just worked out it included LJ accounts. I knew it used Wordpress but whenever I tried to use that account it broke. Anonymity was a convenience thing.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent


miss_s_b: (feminist heroes: oracle)


[personal profile] miss_s_b
2010-05-14 10:01 am UTC (link)
Aha! I see! In which case, to clarify; having IP tracking turned on and actually using it are two different things ;)

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent


wildeabandon: me sitting by the thames (river)


[personal profile] wildeabandon
2010-05-14 10:13 am UTC (link)
Oh, that's awesome! Also, somehow having actually voted for someone who's going to get to make the kind of changes I want to see makes me feel really good, even if my vote didn't make much difference in itself.

(Reply to this



(Anonymous)
2010-05-14 10:14 am UTC (link)
Yup! False assumption on my part.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent



[personal profile] jamie77
2010-05-14 10:52 am UTC (link)
Theresa May has small 'c' conservative views as regards sexuality, gosh you would never expect that of someone in the Conservative Party.

(Reply to this



[identity profile] sl4irl.livejournal.com
2010-05-14 04:58 pm UTC (link)
It's almost as if there's a reason people hate them part from "tribalism", or something wild like that.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent



(9 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Threaded) (Top-level comments only)