miss_s_b: (Politics: Post Feminism)miss_s_b ([personal profile] miss_s_b) wrote,
@ 2010-07-16 11:45 pm UTC
  • Previous Entry
  • Add to Memories
  • Tell someone about this!
  • Next Entry
Current location:in bed
Current mood: depressed
Current music:Saturday Live on the radio
Entry tags:blogging, feminism, wangst
Because I am poorly and have no spoons, I got into a fight I possibly shouldn't have started last night, with someone who winds me up with his sexist behaviour at regular intervals. I'm not going to link to it, because I don't want this post to be about that specific incident, but about the generality. It ended up with him saying to me that I have no right to complain about him not linking to women's views unless I, personally, spoonfeed him women's views to link to.

Now, my instinctive reaction to that is to think fuck you! Why should I do all your work for you, you lazy git?... But that's possibly counterproductive for two reasons. Firstly, and most importantly, as I have discussed before, men will happily self-promote in ways that women won't. Mediocre men will shout from the rooftops about how awesome they are, and the more mediocre they are, the more they shout; awesome women, because of shyness, or socialisation that women who shout are harpies, or insecurity about their awesomeness, are much less likely to self-promote. This is made worse by the fact that very few people will look beyond what is waved in front of their faces, so the shouty men get noticed and the quiet women don't; very few people are willing to hurt somebody else (of whatever gender) by telling them they are mediocre if they are, and so the mediocre people get promotion they don't deserve, just by being shouty (Iain Dale is a PRIME example of that); and thus the cycle that to be noticed half as much as a man, a woman has to be twice as good continues in our supposedly post-feminist times.

The second reason my reaction is counter-productive is male priviledge. Male opinion aggregators are used to being spoonfed. This is unfair and annoying, but telling them to look beyond their spoonfeeding is telling them to do more work that they don't see a reason to do. Even if that were not the case, it takes a special kind of person to resist being spoonfed, why would anybody give themselves extra work to do?

This gives us two reasons why the blokosphere is self-perpetuating, and those two reasons feed into and reinforce each other. Even a completely non-sexist feminist ally man will often unconsciously perpetuate sexism under these circumstances. This is a problem I have been talking about for years, and I still don't have a suitable sword to cut this Gordian Knot. Nobody else seems to have one either.

How do we go about forging one, people?



This blog is proudly sponsored by

If you would like to view this entry with a pale colour scheme click here. If you would like to subscribe to my blog click here for RSS or here for atom.


(Read 46 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)


[personal profile] bagpuss
2010-07-19 04:01 pm UTC (link)
This is interesting, My mum keeps commenting on similar things from her grandchildren and my nieces and newphews, one of whom was having a party and said not to invite a girl as it was no girls allowed untill of course it was pointed out several of the people who wanted to attend were girls and he kind of saw the flaw in his logic but probably didn't really understand.

He won't be being actively taught that boys should exclude girls but something about our society and the way we teach and interact with children has generated that view and I am not sure what we can do about it other than challenge it when we see it ourselves

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread



[personal profile] bagpuss
2010-07-19 04:01 pm UTC (link)
That should read

"who he wanted to attend"

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent



(Read 46 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)