Where are all the Women Bloggers? Right here, as always
Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 06:20 pmI know I'm a bit of a stuck record on this point, but here is some concrete evidence of how the blokosphere works against women, all the while pretending not to:
Mark Pack blogs that the majority of UK bloggers are female. Someone asks him how he knows that; he replies that he got it from the ONS.
Mark would never have known about that ONS data had I not told him about it, but it never enters his head to credit me with the information. It's just information, it's in the public domain, it doesn't really MATTER where he got it from... Right?
I mean, the fact that when blogosphere stories enter the mainstream, the MSM normally credit Guido or the Egregious Tory Tosser, even when the story was almost always broken by someone else and they just picked it up off their RSS feeds or Twitter... as long as the story gets out, it doesn't matter who the source was, right?
Even more obviously: all those black people whose songs Elvis ripped off... As long as the music gets out there, who cares who wrote it?
Even when female bloggers DO do something worth noticing, we never get the credit. And we're told we should be grateful, because at least the information is out when the men deign to notice. I'm sure that this was not a conscious snub by Count Packula. I'm sure he's very wounded that I am even typing this. But you know what? Women are conditioned from birth to know our place, to not speak out in case we upset someone, to keep our heads down and just be grateful... Well fuck that. Sometimes someone needs to have their cage rattled.
If you're seriously about solving the problem of women being excluded, Mark, you might want to stop perpetuating it. Just a thought.

Mark Pack blogs that the majority of UK bloggers are female. Someone asks him how he knows that; he replies that he got it from the ONS.
Mark would never have known about that ONS data had I not told him about it, but it never enters his head to credit me with the information. It's just information, it's in the public domain, it doesn't really MATTER where he got it from... Right?
I mean, the fact that when blogosphere stories enter the mainstream, the MSM normally credit Guido or the Egregious Tory Tosser, even when the story was almost always broken by someone else and they just picked it up off their RSS feeds or Twitter... as long as the story gets out, it doesn't matter who the source was, right?
Even more obviously: all those black people whose songs Elvis ripped off... As long as the music gets out there, who cares who wrote it?
Even when female bloggers DO do something worth noticing, we never get the credit. And we're told we should be grateful, because at least the information is out when the men deign to notice. I'm sure that this was not a conscious snub by Count Packula. I'm sure he's very wounded that I am even typing this. But you know what? Women are conditioned from birth to know our place, to not speak out in case we upset someone, to keep our heads down and just be grateful... Well fuck that. Sometimes someone needs to have their cage rattled.
If you're seriously about solving the problem of women being excluded, Mark, you might want to stop perpetuating it. Just a thought.



no subject
Date: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 06:24 pm (UTC)But yes, the main thrust of your post is entirely correct.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 06:27 pm (UTC)* hug *
You sure you don't want to tell me off for attacking my own side?
no subject
Date: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, October 13th, 2010 07:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 06:33 pm (UTC)Also, how do you get those little 'share this' buttons on your entry? Is it a paid feature?
no subject
Date: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 06:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 08:11 pm (UTC)It's taking me awhile because I'm teaching myself from first principles. Figuring out how they'd only show on public entries took a bit, but it seemed, well, obvious to me.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, October 13th, 2010 06:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 07:07 pm (UTC)Sorry Babes I may have been too hasty :(
(Although Tim did rip into Undergraduate Finance on Saturday at #sldconf)
no subject
Date: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 07:23 pm (UTC)I'm grateful for you having pointed me at the ONS data (and in fact not just pointed me at it but also in the process corrected me on something I'd got wrong, saving me from making repeating the mistake in the future).
I've credited you when I've blogged about the numbers in the past, but didn't on the tweet because, well, it's a tweet - a short comment sent (in this case) on the move quickly to answer someone's query. Likewise the blog was something quickly dashed off before breakfast without links to any sources (e.g. for the Marr quotes either).
I do think crediting people is important, so though I don't agree with all you've said this time, it doesn't wound me. You'll have to try harder than that - though please don't take that as challenge :-))
Mark
PS In the past I've often pointed people at your comment on my blog re. the ONS stats but if there's a blog post of yours that you think suits better for future use, do say.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 07:29 pm (UTC)And I'm not perfect on crediting myself. And this is one small instance.
And I fully believe you didn't do it on purpose, as it says in the initial post.
But small, accidental instances add up. That's all I'm saying. I'm using you as an example, not saying that once this instance is fixed, everything will be ok.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 11:06 pm (UTC)