![[personal profile]](http://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
miss_s_b
There are many many controversies in Who fandom, and there is no opinion you can assert without offending one faction or another, but one of the least controversial opinions is that the writer who was consistently the best in the old series was Robert Holmes. Holmes can be accused of being a hack, it's true, but if he was a hack, he was a great hack, taking elements from everywhere he could find them (classical mythology, his own politics, and famously, Hammer horror films) and fusing them into glorious, memorable stories. He had a great sense of dialogue, and his characterisations were always spot on. And he always, ALWAYS had an eye on the series as a whole, not just his episodes in it.
I think there's a case to be made that Joe Lidster is the Robert Holmes of our generation.
This latest arc of SJA, for example. On first glance it could easily be dismissed as A Nightmare on Elm Street for kids, and it certainly contains the visceral fear that the first Elm Street film did. This was the scariest Who-related thing I have seen on the telly since the show came back, and the fact that it came in the supposed kids' spin-off is to be massively applauded. But it's so much more than that. Luke's fear of growing up and leaving home, and Sarah-Jane's fear of losing him, and the interactions between those two emotional monsters, were beautifully observed and tenderly written. Clyde and Luke's relationship was similarly done. And Rani? Well, it's no wonder that Rani is my small person's favourite character. She really shows the pressure there is on girls to fit in, conform, and do as you are told. And she shows that she is happiest when she breaks through that (even if it's boys helping her to do it).
Julian Bleach was suitably odd as the eponymous character. I particularly approved of his mad laughter. The direction was good, and the special effects were well done considering the budget. Lis Sladen managed to pull off a grand performance. I enjoyed the conscious references to canon, to the afore-mentioned Nightmare on Elm Street, and to the Buffy ep Hush. But really, what this was about, for me, was the story. And the story, although it sagged a little in the second half, was excellent.
Mr Lidster: I salute you. And so does my daughter. When she's stopped hugging the cushion...
I think there's a case to be made that Joe Lidster is the Robert Holmes of our generation.
This latest arc of SJA, for example. On first glance it could easily be dismissed as A Nightmare on Elm Street for kids, and it certainly contains the visceral fear that the first Elm Street film did. This was the scariest Who-related thing I have seen on the telly since the show came back, and the fact that it came in the supposed kids' spin-off is to be massively applauded. But it's so much more than that. Luke's fear of growing up and leaving home, and Sarah-Jane's fear of losing him, and the interactions between those two emotional monsters, were beautifully observed and tenderly written. Clyde and Luke's relationship was similarly done. And Rani? Well, it's no wonder that Rani is my small person's favourite character. She really shows the pressure there is on girls to fit in, conform, and do as you are told. And she shows that she is happiest when she breaks through that (even if it's boys helping her to do it).
Julian Bleach was suitably odd as the eponymous character. I particularly approved of his mad laughter. The direction was good, and the special effects were well done considering the budget. Lis Sladen managed to pull off a grand performance. I enjoyed the conscious references to canon, to the afore-mentioned Nightmare on Elm Street, and to the Buffy ep Hush. But really, what this was about, for me, was the story. And the story, although it sagged a little in the second half, was excellent.
Mr Lidster: I salute you. And so does my daughter. When she's stopped hugging the cushion...
