Doctor Who: the Almost People
Saturday, May 28th, 2011 07:53 pmI liked the first five minutes of that. Then the continuity errors started annoying me - how many sonic screwdrivers? - then Rory falling for Jennifer!Ganger doing the helpless female act annoyed me. Then Jennifer!Ganger/monster looking like Mark Gatiss in the Lazarus experiment really annoyed me.
Then the Doctor committed murder. He's spent the entire two-parter telling us that gangers are people too, that the flesh remembers, that it is sentient, that it feels pain... And then he murders Amy!Ganger in cold blood. I'd figured out that Amy was going to be a ganger, and was wondering how they would resolve it, but I never, never thought they would do it like that.
And yes, I know, he has killed before - notably sending the hand of omega after the daleks - but only EVER after giving people a choice. He gave Davros a choice. He gave the silents a choice. He didn't give Amy!Ganger a choice. He just aimed and fired.
My Doctor is not a murderer. This episode is going into the Definitely Not Canon box in my brain.
I feel genuinely quite ill after that.
Then the Doctor committed murder. He's spent the entire two-parter telling us that gangers are people too, that the flesh remembers, that it is sentient, that it feels pain... And then he murders Amy!Ganger in cold blood. I'd figured out that Amy was going to be a ganger, and was wondering how they would resolve it, but I never, never thought they would do it like that.
And yes, I know, he has killed before - notably sending the hand of omega after the daleks - but only EVER after giving people a choice. He gave Davros a choice. He gave the silents a choice. He didn't give Amy!Ganger a choice. He just aimed and fired.
My Doctor is not a murderer. This episode is going into the Definitely Not Canon box in my brain.
I feel genuinely quite ill after that.



no subject
Date: Saturday, May 28th, 2011 07:22 pm (UTC)They said on Confidential it was like cutting off a signal. That's certainly not how the gangers were portrayed.
And did he give the Silence a choice? I thought it was just kill on sight.
This is all very weird.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Saturday, May 28th, 2011 07:24 pm (UTC)I also don't quite understand why he needed to kill Ganger!Amy either.
no subject
Date: Saturday, May 28th, 2011 07:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: Sunday, May 29th, 2011 10:39 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: Monday, May 30th, 2011 03:25 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: Monday, May 30th, 2011 04:55 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: Tuesday, May 31st, 2011 08:19 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: Tuesday, June 14th, 2011 04:50 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Saturday, May 28th, 2011 07:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Saturday, May 28th, 2011 09:31 pm (UTC)or at least that's how i took it.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Saturday, May 28th, 2011 11:11 pm (UTC)I think it comes down to a messy point which the writers don't seem to have entirely resolved in their own heads. Either the technology behind the gangers is a way of pressing already sentient Flesh into service as a kind of remote control body being driven by the person in the harness, or it is a way of pressing already sentient Flesh into service as a rapid cloning tool, creating a new, "disposable" copy of the person in the harness, including its own copy of that person's memories and attributes.
If it's the former, then how on earth does the lightning strike manage to create a fully sentient clone of the human original when the connection between them is severed? If it's the latter, then why does the original have to stay in the harness the whole time, being "connected" to it?
The implication seems to be that it's something a bit more complex, that the truth is somewhere in between these two options, but what exactly that truth is isn't really explained, which leaves us feeling (at least) that the Doctor has just done something very questionable indeed.
Not to mention that, if that was the real Doctor wearing the wrong shoes, then he was being violent towards Amy earlier in the episode just to sustain the illusion - with no excuse of Flesh-related instability to fall back on, presumably.
All in all a bit of a mess, which I agree looks a lot like an ugly join between what Matthew Graham was thinking and what Steven Moffat was thinking.
It's quite possible that they will explain it away in some future episode, but from what we've just seen it doesn't sit very comfortably.
no subject
Date: Saturday, May 28th, 2011 11:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: Sunday, May 29th, 2011 12:18 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: Sunday, May 29th, 2011 10:56 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Sunday, May 29th, 2011 09:03 pm (UTC)I had applied that same interpretation to what happened with Amy.
*shrug* I'm no expert on Who. I hope that all will become clear :-)
no subject
Date: Monday, May 30th, 2011 03:19 am (UTC)What happens if Amy tries to go through a very physical labor when for all intents and purposes her mind is in another location?
At least, that's how I read the elimination of the Ganger.