miss_s_b: Captain Kathryn Janeway (Feminist Heroes: Janeway)miss_s_b ([personal profile] miss_s_b) wrote,
@ 2011-07-07 11:39 pm UTC
Current mood: guilty
Entry tags:blogging, feminism, libdemmery
Women are the majority, in blogging as in life. You wouldn't know it from a casual glance at either, though. For some reason (or, more accurately, a vast swathe of reasons) even though more women are out there saying stuff, the men get more attention. This is something I have been banging on about for quite some time. Of the top of my head, some of the reasons are as follows:This morning, as you may or may not know, a report came out on lack of female participation in the political blogosphere. One of the report's authors (all men) was someone whom I have been talking to about this issue for quite some time. So far He Who Shall Not Be Named's sole response has been to cherry pick what I told him, discard the rest, and take credit for his research (i.e. what I had told him) when talking about the issue.

However, I don't wish to demonise this man. All he has done is make the most of the opportunities offered to him in the way he sees fit. The fact that the way he sees fit is not the way I would have done it is not really something I can complain about. And I have been guilty of cutting my nose off to spite my face in some regards: for example, I have refused to write for or link to Lib Dem Voice because they accept money from an advertiser I disapprove of (pro tip for firefox/chrome users: install ad block plus). High-minded principles are all well and good, but this is not helping the representation of women in the blokosphere.

So I am going back on my word. If I want to increase female participation in the political blogosphere I am not going to do that by refusing to participate in one of the top ten blogs. The greater good requires that I sacrifice my principled stand. I want to put on record that I still do not approve of MessageSpace or their management (for examples of the reasons why see here and here), and I understand that some people will think the less of me for making this decision. It is not a decision I am taking lightly, but I am taking it none the less.

I hope that any other ladies who are reading this who are Lib Dems will also consider writing for Lib Dem Voice in the near future (you can submit stuff to voiceATlibdemvoiceDOTorg any time you like - or helenATlibdemvoiceDOTorg if you'd rather a person). The men aren't going to help us on this, although some of them might hand-wring from time to time, so we have to help ourselves. Let's show them we have voices. Let's show them we can say interesting things, and that we deserve to be heard.


(Read 11 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

lizw: photo of Blake with text: "reality is a dangerous concept" (reality is dangerous)


[personal profile] lizw
2011-07-08 06:13 am UTC (link)
I'm not going to think any less of you for deciding to prioritise one legitimate political goal over another. But.

Self-Exclusion Doesn't Work

It depends what you mean by "work", doesn't it, or rather on what your goal is? My goal in not writing for or linking to Lib Dem Voice is not to change their minds, and certainly not to increase participation in the political blogosphere: it's to avoid sending my friends to a site where they will encounter right-wing advertising. It achieves that goal very well, so I'm going to keep on doing it. And to the extent I exclude myself from other spaces, it's to maintain a reasonable match between my stress levels and my available spoons, and it usually achieves that quite well too.

I don't think I've ever seen anyone suggest that self-exclusion was going to achieve some sort of sea-change in the way the mainstream does things; most women are not that naive. Usually, it's some variant on "I can't do that no matter how much I'd like to", or "I don't care what it might achieve, I'm not going to dirty myself", or occasionally "fuck the mainstream, we'll do our own thing". I don't like the value judgement inherent in saying that the "greater good" requires you or anyone else to do it anyway, or the implication that the solution to sexism is for women to try harder.

(Reply to this



(Read 11 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)