miss_s_b: (feminist heroes: oracle)miss_s_b ([personal profile] miss_s_b) wrote,
@ 2012-03-11 12:26 am UTC
  • Previous Entry
  • Add to Memories
  • Tell someone about this!
  • Next Entry
Current mood: enraged
Entry tags:libdemmery
Yeah, OK, there are lots of things Liberals don't respond well to. But really, Cleggy? REALLY? If I don't agree with every word of Shirley Williams' motion I am on the side of Andy Burnham?

Well, I guess I'm on the side of Andy Burnham, then. OR NOT. What is WITH YOU? Do you think that sort of wankery is going to make me, and others who don't appreciate what you're doing IN OUR NAME less annoyed with you? Really? Are you THAT stupid? See, this is the thing. I don't think you ARE that stupid. I think you are actively trying to drive me and others like me out of the party. And you know what? You're going to have to try a damn sight harder than that.

...

I just deleted a long stream of invective here, but I really am, very very angry. It's probably a good job I'm not in Gateshead.

(Read 34 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

miss_s_b: (feminist heroes: oracle)


[personal profile] miss_s_b
2012-03-12 01:08 pm UTC (link)
I am legally trained, and I know how legislation works (although I haven't studied this bit of legislation in anything like the depth Andrew has). [A]ny bill that has had more than 1000 amendments added to it wasn't thought through terribly well in the first place and it might be better to go back to the drawing board is something many lawyers would shout from the rooftops if they could; although there are also those who would counter any bill that has had more than 1000 amendments added to it wasn't thought through terribly well in the first place and that means more money for lawyers as we fight it out in the courts down to the last comma.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent) 


(Read 34 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)