miss_s_b: (feminist heroes: oracle)miss_s_b ([personal profile] miss_s_b) wrote,
@ 2012-03-20 09:00 am UTC
Entry tags:heroes, hilarity, history, internet, the blood is the life


(Read 25 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

strangecharm: (postmark)


[personal profile] strangecharm
2012-03-20 11:00 am UTC (link)
I worry that it's the fact that bystanders don't speak out that lets them think their behaviour is acceptable.

Me too. Interestingly, every time lately that I've spoken out on other people's LJs about this, I've been immediately labeled a troll, and a hater, and all kinds of other delightful things.

(Reply to this)  (Thread


miss_s_b: (feminist heroes: oracle)


[personal profile] miss_s_b
2012-03-20 02:02 pm UTC (link)
People are weird things.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent


ginasketch: (smug)


[personal profile] ginasketch
2012-03-20 03:42 pm UTC (link)
Yeah I don't understand "don't feed the troll" either- I'm not feeding the troll, I'm trolling it.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent


matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (MatGB)


[personal profile] matgb
2012-03-20 05:59 pm UTC (link)
I think part of the problem is that people have stopped using the word "troll" to mean "deliberately provocative arsehole looking for an argument and prepared to say stuff they don't necessarily mean" and instead started using it to mean "anyone I disagree with that won't back down", makes it a harder discussion to have.

I've always found engagement without hyperbole normally works better than getting angry as it's getting a rise that they want.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread


gwenhwyfaer: (pic#500867)


[personal profile] gwenhwyfaer
2012-03-20 07:46 pm UTC (link)
I think in some cases, it gets used for "someone saying stuff I'm scared of admitting to myself I agree with because it'll raise all kinds of questions about my worldview that I'm desperately trying to avoid having to deal with". Then it gets even more difficult to have a conversation. The accusation also comes up a lot when someone challenges, even mildly, the prevailing groupthink of a place. Especially when they're a bit odd, or awkward, or spiky to start with. But then, I've noticed that there's a very English attitude of "we'll accept you so long as you keep your head down, but the second you step out of line any distinguishing characteristic is fair game".

My own personal maxim is that if anyone calls me a troll, I'm gone. I try never to be anything other than genuine, but if I've been that bad at communicating (which is always possible!), it seems unlikely I'm going to find the magic words to heal the rift... and if, on the other hand, I haven't actually said anything to warrant the accusation, whatever issues the accuser is dealing with are both not my problem and beyond my reach. Either way, there's simply no possibility of a useful continuation of the debate.

(I suppose another way to put that is that I'm ridiculously easy to bully into silence...)

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent


strangecharm: (postmark)


[personal profile] strangecharm
2012-03-21 10:57 am UTC (link)
Absolutely; I was talking about this with Andrew just yesterday. It's like how people who want to be clever are using "problematic" these days; just to mean "something I don't like/agree with" and is intended to shut down further discussion.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread


gwenhwyfaer: (pic#500867)


[personal profile] gwenhwyfaer
2012-03-21 06:18 pm UTC (link)
Every time I hear the word "problematic", all I can think of is Summer Glau trying to eat a white cake thing on a chain...

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent



(Read 25 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)