The Sweet, Sweet Pie of Smugness
Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 11:25 amWell, we can't pronounce on ALL the predictions yet, but young, white, cis-female, and conventionally attractive? I think we're there on those:
The Doctor's new companion is revealed
I'm sure I'll be able to put up with her character, maybe even I'll like her, but it would have been nice if the opportunity had been taken to have someone a bit more different :(
The Doctor's new companion is revealed
Who she's playing, how the Doctor meets her, and even where he finds her, are all part of one of the biggest mysteries the Time Lord ever encounters. Even by the Doctor's standards, this isn't your usual boy meets girl.- I suspect the biggest mystery the Doctor ever encounters might be overselling it a bit. And
boy meets girl? REALLY? Eurgh.
I'm sure I'll be able to put up with her character, maybe even I'll like her, but it would have been nice if the opportunity had been taken to have someone a bit more different :(



no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 12:15 pm (UTC)But then I kind of stopped watching Who in the Tennant era. I have problems with Sherlock too. (So sue me fangirl/boys.)
no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 12:40 pm (UTC)It are can be April yet? New Bones in April!
no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 12:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 01:35 pm (UTC)I can process this under the noise of how excited I am for Korra.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 12:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 12:38 pm (UTC)FWIW, I would have had the same reaction if it was an actress I like (or even was familiar with) who fit the same criteria. I'm just bored of my televisual life being filled with young, pretty faces. There's no room in telly these days for (to pick an example at random) the likes of Sheila Keith, or even Michael Ripper, and that makes me very sad.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 01:08 pm (UTC)If you look at the full range of companions we've had in Doctor Who since 2005, there have been two non-white characters, one non-het, and two aged 35+. Three if you count River as a companion. I don't even know what 'conventionally attractive' means in the context of a series which gave a lead role to the very unconventional-looking Matt Smith. And you may remember US fans being thrilled that they cast a 'fat chick' to play Rose (/eyeroll).
no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 01:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 01:31 pm (UTC)I also think it's interesting that (for totally innocent reasons) a post about how there isn't enough variety in female form on telly has turned into a discussion of a leading male.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 01:48 pm (UTC)This is exactly the same line of argument that followed the casting announcements around The Last Airbender movie and it trotted out every single time that someone points out a dearth of people of colour on our screens. The arguments stack up and we end up with the general implication that only white people can act.
You do mention 'turned up for auditions', but don't forget that casting calls often specify race. Usually the decision to cast a specific ethinicity is made before the audition process starts.
It's a tired old argument. Yes, Corry lady is probably a great actress. That's hardly the point. There are many many skilled actors and actresses available, and many of them aren't young, white, conventually attractive cissexuals.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 04:30 pm (UTC)So it isn't fair to attack this actor for taking the role, but it's certainly fair to see her as being symptomatic of a problem with the production.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 01:18 pm (UTC)I doubt the BBC did any favours though, by not issuing a photograph of her looking suitably companion-like or mysterious. At least when karen Gillian was announced, there was also a Doctor Who-esque pic of her which made her look pretty but not glam/dull. The only pic I've seen of Ms. Colman so far is from some Inside Soap awards where she's looking like a Hollyoaks wanna-be, which is inevitably colouring my knee-jerk reaction. *
(and because visually, I like Scottish redheads, so Karen Gillan was always going to get double-plus points from me)
no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 01:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, March 22nd, 2012 08:15 am (UTC)Good thing I don't want to be a casting officer.
no subject
Date: Thursday, March 22nd, 2012 01:08 pm (UTC)(Natalie Dormer's always been stuck with 'too pretty to be interesting' characters that never do justice to her skill. I first noticed her in Casanova.)
no subject
Date: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 08:52 pm (UTC)Certainly I don't think Chris Eccleston'd be cast now.
no subject
Date: Thursday, March 22nd, 2012 08:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, March 22nd, 2012 01:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, March 22nd, 2012 01:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, March 22nd, 2012 08:19 pm (UTC)