miss_s_b: Calderdale Results

miss_s_b (

miss_s_b) wrote,
@ 2012-05-04 01:09 pm UTC

Current mood:	tired
Entry tags:	elections

Calderdale Results

I came third. BUT I got more votes than I got last year in H&L AND more votes than last year's candidate in Brighouse got. Mat came fourth. Overall we held up fairly well; although I am sad that Olwen and Christine and Stephen didn't win their seats, Olwen in particular got a very impressive vote share, beating the sitting Tory into third place. And we held Calder ward, and Greetland and Stainland is back with us (can't really call THAT a gain)...

So, you know, it's bad, but it's not awful.

The big story, as nationally, is low turnout. Over all of Calderdale the turnout was in the thirties, and even in the hotly contested wards it didn't get above 45%. In Calderdale. We've always been particularly politically engaged around here, and my experience in the call centre phone canvassing the last few weeks has borne that out. Calderdale people are engaged; they know the names and records of the candidates in their wards, and they actually have opinions and they care. If we can't get turnout over 50% in that sort of atmosphere, there really is something utterly wrong, and it needs addressing.

(Read 14 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

no subject

jo
2012-05-04 01:46 pm UTC (link)

I have to admit that local elections in the UK baffle me. I have no idea why you have political parties at that level - we don't have political parties at the municipal level in Canada, except for Montreal and Vancouver, but the parties there aren't "real" parties - meaning they have no relation at all to any provincial or federal parties - they exist in those cities.

If you insist on having parties at the municipal level, they should be totally separate from the national parties. It makes no sense to be campaigning on the same issues when local gov't basically doesn't really do anything but implement what is dictated to them from above, yeah? The ideal of having any of our federal party leaders stumping around campaigning for local councillors here in Canada is just bizarre. Even provincial premiers don't get involved in local politics. Federal politicians don't even get involved in provincial politics, for the most part, and the provincial and federal wings of parties are quite separate entities that campaign on totally different platforms since they do totally different things and have totally different areas of responsibility. In actual fact, there is often a lot of hostility between the federal and provincial wings of the same party.

But yeah - assuming that how people vote for a town council has any bearing on how they'd vote for a national government is just weird. As for turnout being really low - par for the course isn't it? Local election turnout here is always abysmal because people know town halls have no power - they're under provincial jurisdiction. And since there was no national election going on - where real change might be possible - is it really that surprising no one came out to vote? Changing a local council will have no impact on overall national policy, so...

(Reply to this) (Thread) (Hide 2 comments) (Show 2 comments)

	no subject miss_s_b 2012-05-04 01:49 pm UTC (link)
	See, the idea of having separate parties for local and national seems odd to me... How do the local parties get funded? (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	no subject daweaver 2012-05-04 06:00 pm UTC (link)
	For about 40% of England, these are the equivalent of provincial elections - there's nothing between the city council and the Westminster government. The old municipal councils, for a third tier of government, were abolished for most urban (and some rural) areas in the last quarter-century. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

(Read 14 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)