miss_s_b: (Mood: Miserable Brian :()miss_s_b ([personal profile] miss_s_b) wrote,
@ 2012-06-21 10:33 pm UTC
Current mood: nauseated
Entry tags:theatre
Was very faithful to the book, apart from in one important aspect which I will get to shortly. Had beautiful set design, and amazing, AMAZING make-up. Had stunningly good performances from all concerned, even the little lad who played William. And having seen it, I feel sick to my stomach.

You see, nobody told me that the one major change they made, after being very faithful to the spirit and letter of the book throughout, is that before the Creature kills Elizabeth he brutally rapes her and screams "Now I am a MAN!"

If this had been a film, there would have been a warning about strong sexual violence and I wouldn't have gone to see it, because I know my triggers well enough. I have no desire to ban this sort of thing, or any sort of artistic expression, but I would like to make an informed choice about what I hand over money to see. But it wasn't a film, it was a filmed theatre production, so there were no warnings. I would have really appreciated a warning. If I had had a warning, I would not have gone, because the performances were really very good, and I won't sleep tonight they were so convincing.

So next time I am planning to go see a national theatre production I will be waiting until someone I know and trust has seen it, and then I can ask them about it. And then they can tell me Oh yes, it's very faithful to the source material, well, aside from the fact that they inserted a completely gratuitous and unnecessary brutal rape scene which adds nothing to the plot and will traumatise you. But apart from that it's very good.

I'm going to shout at Question Time for a bit now. Hopefully that will work as brain bleach.


(Read 16 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

drunkwriter: Me in South Park form. (Default)


[personal profile] drunkwriter
2012-06-22 09:39 am UTC (link)
Ick. And there's me having been very gloomy that I've missed every opportunity to see this production, for various reasons.

However, there is some evidence in the book to suggest that the Creature has his way with Elizabeth. I remember not particularly agreeing with the interpretation in the lesson in question, but it is there.

(Reply to this)  (Thread


miss_s_b: (feminist heroes: oracle)


[personal profile] miss_s_b
2012-06-22 12:00 pm UTC (link)
As I say above, there's a difference between the creature killing Elizabeth off page and Victor discovering her body (as it happens in the book) in which case, yes, she MAY have been raped but we don't see it and it's inferred at best, and the extremely brutal and visual rape scene I saw last night, which ended with the creature snapping Elizabeth's neck at the moment of orgasm and then screaming out "now I am a MAN!"

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread


drunkwriter: Me in South Park form. (Default)


[personal profile] drunkwriter
2012-06-22 12:36 pm UTC (link)
Oh dear. No, there's certainly a departure from the source text there.

Though one wonders if you've seen Atonement on the evil!Cumberbatch front.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent



(Read 16 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)