The Blood is The Life 29-08-2012
Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 10:00 am- Amazon Customers Go Rogue, Hilariously Review Bic's Idiotic Pen for Women
- Janeway Doesn’t Deserve This Shit | Tor.com
MMost of the comments are depressingly full of Janeway hate, but I liked this one: "At a time when most media and the world was sending me really damaging messages about what a proper woman was, Kathryn Janeway was there. Captain Janeway taught me that I could be nerdy, strong, feminine, and stubborn. I could stand my ground against others, not giving in, and still be a woman. She taught me it it was okay to battle depression and okay to fall in love, even if I lost the guy. When everyone else was telling me I was wrong, I knew Janeway would have stood with me and told them I was right. Voyager was so cool because it had such a wide variety of awesome female characters that had such different personalities, yet they were all strong women. Even when it wasn’t at its best, it was a really empowering show to grow up with."
- Peter Hain should really try to remember his history « Strange Thoughts
- “On Being Demonized” – a disabled 38 Degrees members’ perspective
Maybe the paralympics will help with this? I'm still not over the cruel irony of them being sponsored by ATOS...
- George Galloway under fire again after calling Twitter user a 'window licker' - UK Politics - UK - The Independent
George does it again
- Apple v Samsung—the two models of innovation that explain the case
- Abortion Hotline Launched In Nairobi - Identity Kenya
Very courageous, noble, and necessary thing.
- Uh Oh, a liberal Atheist writes about liberal Christians, this can’t end well | Robinince's Blog
- Everyday Sexism: It isn’t restricted to adults – even young girls in school uniform share their experiences | | Independent Editor's choice Blogs
The comments to this are just depressing. Full of derailing.



no subject
Date: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 11:02 am (UTC)My problems with Voyager (not Janeway) were I didn't think many of the plotlines were that good. Plus I really like 7 of 9's bluntness but hate the way they reduced her to eye candy in a skintight outfit. And don't get me started on that HORRIBLE victim blaming episode involving 7 of 9. D: D:
Sadly, TNG was the worst for female characters. They never really got to do anything...
But then, neither did Worf sometimes lol
no subject
Date: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 11:11 am (UTC)According to Stewart, de Lancie and several Star Trek writers, it was canon that he was in love with Picard, which implies he doesn't give a stuff about gender. (The Q are meant to be genderless after all.) De Lancie even calls him "bispecial." His going after Janeway is not what I have a problem with given his penchant for Starship Captains- the problem was giving him a jealous, female Q mate. I mean, seriously, what? Like the Q would give a shit about that sort of thing. They're billions of years old. I'm sure they've ...ahem...been around.
/end rant.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 12:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 12:33 pm (UTC)">>So why doesn’t Janeway get a place on every top 10 list for great female characters?"
Because she was rubbish. I *like* the actress in other things, this is nothing to do with her, it's the personality of the character and the decisions she made. I'd watch Picard do new episodes today despite TNG often being so problematic and bland. I have no need to ever see Janeway on my screen again, I'm bored even thinking about it.
(DS9 all the way).
no subject
Date: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 12:59 pm (UTC)(It also had plenty of genderfail just like all of them)
Oh, we're allowed to disagree :D Nothing more personal and subjective than Star Trek preferences!
Mind you, I'd watch THIS
http://youtu.be/V9Q2X32hZNk
no subject
Date: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 01:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, August 30th, 2012 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Friday, August 31st, 2012 11:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Friday, August 31st, 2012 12:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Friday, August 31st, 2012 12:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, September 1st, 2012 02:18 pm (UTC)