Julie Burchill: Not in my Name
Sunday, January 13th, 2013 11:43 amI am a cis white feminist, like Julie Burchill. I have quite a lot of privilege, although perhaps not as much as Julie Burchill, given that national newspapers don't give me a platform for my views. Also like Julie Burchill, I do not pretend to understand the experience or feelings of transfolk
Where I differ from Julie Burchill appears to be that I consider trans people to be human beings whose thoughts and experiences are just as valid as my own. I can't understand but I can empathise and I can listen and I can try to not be an ignorant hate filled shitstain. The article printed in today's observer under Burchill's name is filled with the kind of prejudicial language that makes any person with a heart feel sick. The observer would never have printed an analogous article on the subject of (for example) race. If somebody wrote a piece saying niggers and pakis should shut up and stop whinging and making "jokes" about curry, the observer would rightly refuse to publish it. Why in the name of Cthulhu they thought this article was acceptable, then, I can't even begin to fathom. Perhaps it's Daily Mail style link bait. Perhaps it's talking up controversy for the sake of website hits. Whatever it is, it's naked and unadorned hatred, and it's unacceptable from a newspaper which claims to be progressive.
Julie Burchill does not speak for me, and if she speaks for you then you are not a person I want to pay any attention to whatsoever.
Where I differ from Julie Burchill appears to be that I consider trans people to be human beings whose thoughts and experiences are just as valid as my own. I can't understand but I can empathise and I can listen and I can try to not be an ignorant hate filled shitstain. The article printed in today's observer under Burchill's name is filled with the kind of prejudicial language that makes any person with a heart feel sick. The observer would never have printed an analogous article on the subject of (for example) race. If somebody wrote a piece saying niggers and pakis should shut up and stop whinging and making "jokes" about curry, the observer would rightly refuse to publish it. Why in the name of Cthulhu they thought this article was acceptable, then, I can't even begin to fathom. Perhaps it's Daily Mail style link bait. Perhaps it's talking up controversy for the sake of website hits. Whatever it is, it's naked and unadorned hatred, and it's unacceptable from a newspaper which claims to be progressive.
Julie Burchill does not speak for me, and if she speaks for you then you are not a person I want to pay any attention to whatsoever.



no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 01:10 pm (UTC)Oh yes, it's because she's a vile, hateful unapologetic transphobe and has been for years.
My finger is seriously hovering over the defriend button at some people on FB.
no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 01:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 01:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 01:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 01:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 01:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 01:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 01:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 02:04 pm (UTC)Normally these things come in threes so I wonder what's next.
no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 03:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 03:16 pm (UTC)Burchill's article is horrible and hate filled. And may well lead to trans people being beaten up or abused in some way, more than they are already.
But having two lots of people shouting at each other isn't going to tackle the prejudice and bust the myths. We need illumination, not conflagration, as they say.
no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 03:28 pm (UTC)This is why I am hiding under the duvet.
no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 05:45 pm (UTC)http://carons-musings.blogspot.co.uk/20
no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 06:49 pm (UTC)http://magister.dreamwidth.org/15815.ht
no subject
Date: Sunday, January 13th, 2013 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, January 14th, 2013 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, January 14th, 2013 09:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, January 16th, 2013 11:39 am (UTC)Burchill does not speak for me as a Jew, a cis woman or a feminist.