miss_s_b: (Who: Six (ot3))
[personal profile] miss_s_b
Dear media people,

I see that, thanks to Cathy Newman's interview last night, the thorny theological topic of Sin has raised its ugly head once more.

Let me get this right out in the beginning: I don't give a fig what Tim Farron's religious beliefs are. You know why? Because I am a Liberal. He could believe the sky is made from Puff the Magic Dragon's bumfluff, and I wouldn't care one jot, whit or iota. What I do care about, and care deeply about, is
  1. How Tim Farron votes in parliament

  2. How he treats people - LGBT+ people in particular - in everyday life
So lets do a little list of things which illustrate how Tim Farron views LGBT people:
  1. With one exception, Tim Farron voted fully in favour of same sex marriage. The one time he abstained? That was because he was trying to get an amendment passed on the Spousal Veto, a really nasty little clause which shafts trans people. Yep, that's right, even the time he abstained was because he was fighting for LGBT+ rights, not against them.

  2. He was the first party leader to issue a statement on the gay concentration camps in Chechenya. He condemned them in the strongest terms. And while the Greens have since joined in, none of the Tories, Labour, or UKIP have.

  3. He campaigned against section 28 from its inception, and thinks that refusing people service for their sexuality (like bakeries not baking cakes for gay marriages) is unchristian.

  4. He spoke out on the blood donation ban (I'm still banned from giving blood, by the way - because I have had sexual relations with bisexual men).

  5. He has campaigned tirelessly for the rights of trans women in prisons, and trans issues in general. When we had a trans rights motion before conference, he was there at 9.30am in the front row to vote for it. Not because of the cameras - there were no cameras - but because he is enthusiastic about LGBT+ rights, and not just G rights with a smattering of L like many politicians.

  6. When Lib Dem conference brought in an accreditation scheme that inadvertently discriminated against LGBT+ people, he listened to us at LGBT+LDs, and then he went to head office and batted for us till the scheme was changed, and eventually dropped.

  7. He has said to me personally that when poly marriage is made legal he wants to be the first on the invite list to our wedding.
Look, I could go on for hours here, but it is as plain as the nose on my face that Tim Farron is no homophobe. So why do the media keep treating him like he is? Well, in the past, he has made some missteps - accepting that intern from the gay cure people, for example. But if you actually look at what happened in that case? The second he confirmed those people were campaigners for a gay cure, he backed away, apologised fulsomely, and campaigned hard against the concept of curing gay people. Me, personally? I value a leader who will listen and change his mind when someone points out he's wrong - Cthulhu alone knows Cleggy never did.

The other reason is possibly a conflation of the word "sin" with the concept of "bad thing for which I am judging you" in general parlance.

Reverend Lovejoy delineates what sin is

I'm an atheist. Yes, I have A-level RE, but I do not know Christianity from the inside. However, even I have heard of the Christian concept of "judge not lest ye be judged". As Tom King says at some length in this twitter thread, the Christian belief means that you explicitly do not condemn people who sin, because we are all sinners and judging people is God's job. Whether or not Tim Farron believes that homosexual sex (or heterosexual sex, or wanking, or eating beef on Fridays, or anything) is sinful, this has no bearing on his actions because it is not his place to judge.

I don't pretend to understand that belief system. But I accept it, just as I accept Islam, and paganism, and the church of the flying spaghetti monster. I accept it because to not accept that people can differ in their beliefs from you and yet still be worthwhile people is fundamentally illiberal. I'll tell you something that is liberal, though. If a person believes in their heart of hearts that something is wrong, and yet still campaigns for the right of other people to do it because it's other people's right to make their own moral choices?

That, my friends, that is liberalism.

I await your forensic questioning of the Prime Minister on her voting record with regard to LGBT+ rights with interest.

Lots of love

Jennie
Acting chair LGBT+ Lib Dems, bisexual polyamorist, and person who voted for Tim Farron to be her party leader and is happy that she did.

Date: Wednesday, April 19th, 2017 11:35 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
On the other hand, while Tim Farron has every right to his religious views, however weird they may be, if he is standing for public office the electorate has every right to take his religious views into account when deciding how to vote.

It is also not true that when he abstained in the parliamentary vote on same-sex marriage "he was trying to get an amendment passed". What happened was that the amendments had failed, so he abstained on the third reading vote of the unamended bill. Nor had the amendments only concerned the spousal veto. Farron had voted to allow registrars to refuse to carry out same-sex marriages, if they had religious objections.

Frankly, I do not believe that Farron's voting record - on same-sex marriage or on abortion - has not been influenced in the past by his religious beliefs.

Chris

Date: Wednesday, April 19th, 2017 03:08 pm (UTC)
po8crg: A cartoon of me, wearing a panama hat (Default)
From: [personal profile] po8crg
Entirely unconnected to the above comment, I've just found this interesting story on the BBC website.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39644152

Date: Wednesday, April 19th, 2017 08:30 pm (UTC)
legionseagle: (Default)
From: [personal profile] legionseagle
How on earth did you lot manage to get an all-women shortlist, given they must have had to run the Rennard gauntlet?

Date: Monday, April 24th, 2017 04:44 pm (UTC)
po8crg: A cartoon of me, wearing a panama hat (Default)
From: [personal profile] po8crg
Tha answer appears to be: all seats vacated by sitting MPs in England get an all-women shortlist until we get to some acceptable percentage of women MPs (I think it's either 40% or 45%, but don't quote me on that).

It only applies in England because the Welsh and Scottish parties each have control of candidature.

Scotland applies a different set of rules, which I forget the details of.

Wales refuses to have any rules on candidates, and has one male MP and one female AM - and the AM group was 3-3 back when there were six of them, so perhaps they know what they're doing?

Date: Saturday, April 22nd, 2017 12:39 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Thank you for publishing my comment.

On the liberal argument for allowing registrars to refuse to marry same-sex couples, obviously the danger is that people will also claim it's liberal to allow B and B proprietors to refuse to accommodate gay couples and so on (and perhaps to discriminate against other groups if their beliefs are wacky enough). That kind of "liberalism" would be very different from the (now) liberal consensus that underlies the Equality Act, and I think a choice needs to be made between the two. I would say you are certainly right that if people choose to be service providers then they need to provide services to everyone without discriminating.

This was apparently Tim Farron's dilemma in 2007 regarding the regulations that outlawed discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. He wanted more exemptions, and ended up voting against the regulations when he didn't get them. To his credit, he subsequently said he had changed his view on that question.

What I don't like is the portrayal of Tim Farron as a kind of LGBT rights crusader from Day One. I think his priorities clearly didn't lie in that direction earlier in his career. But he is clearly trying to compensate for that now (and perhaps sometimes to over-compensate). I just hope that his answer in the House of Commons encompassed physical relationships as well as just sexual orientation. If he's asked the "sex" question and starts hedging again it will trip him up.

Chris

About This Blog

Hello! I'm Jennie (known to many as SB, due to my handle, or The Yorksher Gob because of my old blog's name). This blog is my public face; click here for a list of all the other places you can find me on t'interwebs.






Flattr this

Ebuzzing - Top Blogs Ebuzzing - Top Blogs - Politics





Goodreads: Book reviews, recommendations, and discussion




==================
Charities I support:

The Survivors' Trust - donate here
DogsTrust - donate here
CAB - donate here

==================


Creative Commons License
Miss SB by Jennie Rigg is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.
Based on a work at miss-s-b.dreamwidth.org.

Please note that any and all opinions expressed in this blog are subject to random change at whim my own, and not necessarily representative of my party, or any of the constituent parts thereof (except myself, obviously).

Printed by Dreamwidth Studios, Maryland USA. Promoted by Jennie Rigg, of Brighouse, West Yorkshire.

Most Popular Tags