In my relentless carping about how people don't pay attention to female bloggers, one thing I neglected to take full account of is that the cycle of the blokosphere not paying attention to women is largely self-perpetuating. There follow a number of gross generalisations:
awesomegore is another.
What can be done about this? Well, boys, I'm going to rec you some female blogs. Regardless of my detestment of positive discrimination (see the post I will be making later today on rules versus guidelines for why this absolutely is not ironic at all, honest guv), it strikes me that you poor little lads can't be expected to go and LOOK for female blogs; you need someone to wave them in your face because your male privilege tells you that if anything is really important, it will be handed to you on a plate. Consider this blog post (and hopefully the comments to it) your plate.
There are more recs in the comments, as well as interesting discussions on the nature of blogging, and boys asserting that they actually do read blogs by women in a not-at-all-predictable way ;)
This list is a by-no-means-exhaustive list of fabulous blogs that I know to be written wholly or mostly by women, currently active and not f-locked, and always interesting. I don't always agree with the content of them, but it's always worth reading. Where I know of it, I have given the Dreamwidth syndicated feed link. Most of these also have syndication on LJ. I present them in alphabetical order for your delectation:
This blog is proudly sponsored by
- Bloggers, when they first start compiling a reading list, look for bloggers who they like instinctively. This is likely to boil down to
someone who appears to think like me
- For male bloggers, this regularly involves randomly adding male bloggers to their list, and skipping over the females, regardless of whether or not the blogger's sex is apparent from their name.
- Sometimes they ask for recs. Their largely male circle recs them largely male blogs
- The cycle continues
What can be done about this? Well, boys, I'm going to rec you some female blogs. Regardless of my detestment of positive discrimination (see the post I will be making later today on rules versus guidelines for why this absolutely is not ironic at all, honest guv), it strikes me that you poor little lads can't be expected to go and LOOK for female blogs; you need someone to wave them in your face because your male privilege tells you that if anything is really important, it will be handed to you on a plate. Consider this blog post (and hopefully the comments to it) your plate.
There are more recs in the comments, as well as interesting discussions on the nature of blogging, and boys asserting that they actually do read blogs by women in a not-at-all-predictable way ;)
The List
This list is a by-no-means-exhaustive list of fabulous blogs that I know to be written wholly or mostly by women, currently active and not f-locked, and always interesting. I don't always agree with the content of them, but it's always worth reading. Where I know of it, I have given the Dreamwidth syndicated feed link. Most of these also have syndication on LJ. I present them in alphabetical order for your delectation:
- Alix Mortimer (also available at
alix_mortimer_feed) - the Angry Black Woman (also available at
theangryblackwoman_feed) - But you're a girl! (also available at
but_youre_a_girl_feed) - Charlotte Gore (also available at
charlotte_gore_feed and sometimes masquerading as
awesomegore) - Feminist Mums (also available at
feminist_mums_feed) - GeekaChicas (also available at
geeka_chicas_feed - the Hathor Legacy (also available at
hathorlegacy_feed)
innerbrat (also available at
innerbrat)
lizw (also available at
lizw)
nanila- PC Bloggs (also available at
pc_bloggs_feed) - Penny Red (also available at
pennyred_feed
pickwick (also available at
pickwick- Pink Stinks (also available at
pink_stinks_feed) Sara Bedford (also available at - Stephanomics (also available at
stephanomics_feed)
strangefrontier
This blog is proudly sponsored by




no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 12:30 pm (UTC)of my regular political blogroll are written by women.
How would you define "writing like women" then, if that doesn't apply to you or the awesome Gore (or indeed the amazing
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 12:43 pm (UTC)This is why I like ms_daisy_cutter, though she doesn't often make posts public.
Blast...
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 12:44 pm (UTC)Re: Blast...
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 01:15 pm (UTC)As to this thing about writing like a man, I'm not quite sure how that works. Are there conspicuous differences between the way men and women write? If so, I can't say I've ever noticed. Unless the men are writing about cars, football and boobs, and then their maleness tends to become a bit more obvious.
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 01:59 pm (UTC)As to the thing about writing like a man, see comment to
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 02:21 pm (UTC)So what makes you believe these "test your blog to see what gender you are" things can be relied upon? They could have been devised by fools with bizarre ideas about gender.
I've known you online for years now, but I can't remember ever thinking you were a bloke. So there.
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 02:30 pm (UTC)You can redefine the word as much as you like, but that's not what it means.:
# read, write, or edit a shared on-line journal
# web log: a shared on-line journal where people can post diary entries about their personal experiences and hobbies
That's what you do. You sir, are a blogger.
To be fair, until recently most of LJ was ignored by the rest of blogland, and ignored blogland, but LJ is definitely a blogging platform and you have a blog on it.
In fact, the most successful and useful type of blogging is small interconnected groups of friends talking crap. Only the very small minority of blogs are taking themselves seriously or trying to get noticed.
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 02:49 pm (UTC)Now THAT sounds like what I do on LJ! LOL
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 02:31 pm (UTC)I know for a fact that the test the gender of your blog things can't be relied upon, because they always peg me as a bloke. However, there must be something about my writing which strikes them as masculine, and which many other female bloggers lack. Or maybe it's some essential femininity that I lack...
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 03:17 pm (UTC)Who indeed? ;P
So, it's not that your writing is either masculine or feminine, but that the people who devised the tests falsely associate some writing traits with one gender or the other. The tests must be based on inaccurate stereotypes, and the results should be ignored.
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 05:16 pm (UTC)* slaps openID with a wet fish *
I know less people who are "female" than "male", it must be said...
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 01:25 pm (UTC)(Sorry just couldn't resist)
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 01:28 pm (UTC)You appear to have skipped over my dear friend and blogger Caron (http://carons-musings.blogspot.com)
(Sorry just couldn't resist)
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 02:02 pm (UTC)And means that *I* don't hurt my eyes reading it.
As for Caron, I can't believe I forgot her! She was one of the main motive forces behind me writing this post as well. I certainly didn't do it so that I can bump her up the wikio rankings by linking to her blog every time she is mentioned in the comments or anything like that. That would be gaming the system and wrong. Wouldn't it, Caron?
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 02:29 pm (UTC)And
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 02:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 03:31 pm (UTC)I'd also second the recommendations above of Innerbrat, Penny Red, Helium Flash, Alix Mortimer and Charlotte Gore.
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 08:53 pm (UTC)So if men read you, then that doesn't count, because you count as a man? Except for when you want to complain that people are ignoring you, at which point you count as a woman?
Explain, pls.
no subject
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, May 28th, 2009 12:52 pm (UTC)(you might have begun to notice i've been reading these entries for a while. i just haven't had any constructive input on the lib dem front. :\ the whole jo swinson fiasco, however, appalls me.)
no subject
Date: Thursday, May 28th, 2009 05:31 pm (UTC)I'm a woman and would add.....
Date: Monday, May 25th, 2009 10:11 pm (UTC)To offset this, though I realise there are many blogs completing for attention, yet people don't have to:
a)Place their judgement solely on the first few words of a blog post or how quickly it loads.
b)If you do agree with a post, when you see something you don't completely agree with, what's the big deal? If you just want your opinions echoed, stand in a room and talk to yourself!
c)If people don't post every 2 hours, it doesn't mean they don't post, not everyone is in the position to post full time or continuously over the day.
d)Give a blogger a handful of posts to get some sort of feel for them before judging.
Thanks for bringing up this point Miss s b or Janeway, which ever you'd prefer. I'm going to take this opportunity for shameless self promotion, to add my blog! > Crust Of The Grouch (http://crustofthegrouch.blogspot.com/)
Re: I'm a woman and would add.....
Date: Tuesday, May 26th, 2009 04:08 am (UTC)Re: I'm a woman and would add.....
Date: Tuesday, May 26th, 2009 08:24 am (UTC)Re: I'm a woman and would add.....
Date: Wednesday, May 27th, 2009 08:31 am (UTC)that's true. But isn't that because we're more well-rounded individuals and the lads are all a bit "single issue"?
And I wouldn't normally be so forward, but since others have and I'm a brand newbie at this blogging lark, here's my own dets:
Julia Smith
http://10mh.net
In case that's just rank bad manners, I'd also like to mention Sadie's Tavern: http://sadiestavern.blogspot.com/
Re: I'm a woman and would add.....
Date: Wednesday, May 27th, 2009 10:42 am (UTC)Re: I'm a woman and would add.....
Date: Thursday, May 28th, 2009 01:20 am (UTC)Misandry much?
Lots of male political bloggers post about other stuff. Some of them do so on separate blogs, because they know that the readership for one subject isn't always the same as the readership for others. See, for instance, Dale's West Ham blog. But no, I'm sure it's nothing to do with that, I'm sure it's all just that we're far too limited to be "well-rounded individuals", I'm sure that all the men who write about politics are anal weirdo obsessives.
If you want people to read you, a good start is not to insult half your potential readership.
Yes, I realise I'm tired and crabby, but the point still stands.
no subject
Date: Monday, June 29th, 2009 10:43 pm (UTC)We are, in fact, entirely written by people with two X chromosomes (though we reserve the right to grant honorary Chica status to to a deserving male, it hasn't come up yet).
When I first showed the blog to to people on a few small forums (ones kindly disposed to me and populated by a variety of web-savvy folk) one complaint I got was "It's too femme-oriented." It came from a fella, bless his heart.
My response was to blink very slowly and say, "Oh, really? And water is wet! Oh, no! Whatever shall do?"
It really seemed -- odd is the word I'm groping for, I guess-- to some of the men that I would intentionally make a website that did not cater to their interests, or specifically target them as part of its audience. But it wasn't an exclusionary thing -- I just wanted to make a website that I'd want to visit, is all. Whether or not men would like it never really mattered one way or the other.
Thanks again for the mention!
no subject
Date: Monday, June 29th, 2009 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, June 29th, 2009 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, June 29th, 2009 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, June 30th, 2009 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, June 30th, 2009 11:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, June 30th, 2009 02:28 pm (UTC)*squee*