Sherlock "review" (FAO @markgatiss @steven_moffat )
Monday, August 9th, 2010 03:27 amThe series so far, barring the gender-and-race-fail which is endemic in television (and which has been amply covered elsewhere - for example here and here), has been excellent. And yeah, I know that's a big thing to be barring, but...
The third and final episode wasn't as bad as the first two (especially not the second) for those things. What it was, was:
Mystic SB foresees many fandom icons.
Just, you know, Grand Moff? Mr Gatiss? Sort out the gender-and-race-fail for next time. Please? Because then it would be perfect.
I really wish they had cast the gorgeous girl who plays the sergeant who calls Sherlock "freak" and whose name I forget because her character was clearly a tokenistic bolt-on as LeStrade. That would have been awesome.
This blog is proudly sponsored by 

The third and final episode wasn't as bad as the first two (especially not the second) for those things. What it was, was:
- beautifully written by Mark Gatiss, seamlessly slotting in clever references to the source materials with modern twists
- brilliantly directed, pulling the stylistic cues we had got used to from the first two episodes and swirling them around the story in a glorious work of art
- stunningly acted by the Martin Freeman and Benedict Frumious Bandersnatch, and indeed, most of the other actors. I particularly liked the blind old lady
- enjoyable from start to finish
Mystic SB foresees many fandom icons.
Just, you know, Grand Moff? Mr Gatiss? Sort out the gender-and-race-fail for next time. Please? Because then it would be perfect.
I really wish they had cast the gorgeous girl who plays the sergeant who calls Sherlock "freak" and whose name I forget because her character was clearly a tokenistic bolt-on as LeStrade. That would have been awesome.




